Billionaire businessman, Deji Adeleke, addresses paternity claims against his son, Davido (videos)

 Dr Deji Adeleke, the billionaire father of singer, David Adeleke aka Davido, has come out to address the paternity claims made against his son, Davido.

 

A young lady based in Ibadan, Ayo Labinjo, has insisted that she had sexu@l relations with Davido when he visited Ibadan some years ago and that she got pregnant and had a baby girl on November 19, 2013 and that the singer has since refused to take responsibility for the little girl named Anu.

 

Recently, the issue came up online after Anu via her IG page appealed to the singer to carry out a fresh DNA test just so she can be sure he is indeed not her father. Davido in his reaction, said that five DNA tests have been carried out and that all the tests came out negative.

 

Today, Deji Adedeji held a press conference in which he addressed the paternity claims. He described the claims as unnecessary and says DNA test results indicate that 12-year-old Anuoluwapo is not the singer’s child. He stated that while his son cannot take responsibility for a child that does not belong to him, Anu deserves to know her father.

 

According to him, five DNA tests have been done to verify the paternity claim, but, he says all of them have proved otherwise. Davido’s father told the gathering that the singer has never denied owning a child.

 

 

“I am Deji Adeleke, I’m the father of five children, three boys and two girls. David Adeleke, who you all know as Davido, is the baby of my family, he’s the last.

 

I’m calling this press conference, and this is my very first time addressing the press, and for just one single reason. I’m not on social media, but I’m sure those of you on social media have been inundated with all kinds of talks about this issue that keeps coming up almost every year, regarding one little girl called Anuoluwapo, who lives in Ibadan, whom Kemi Olunloyo has continually alleged that David is the father of the little girl.

 

Adeleke disclosed that he first became aware of the allegation in 2014, when he received a letter from a lawyer in Ibadan, alongside photographs, documents, and a birth certificate listing “Adeleke David” as the child’s father.

 

“Tracing the matter back to its origin, Adeleke explained that he first became aware of the claim in 2014, when he received a DHL package from Ibadan containing photographs of Davido and the child, a birth certificate listing “Adeleke David” as the father, and a letter from the child’s grandmother.

 

He said the child’s grandmother, a widow, appealed to him to persuade Davido to submit to a paternity test, stressing that she was not seeking marriage or financial extortion, but confirmation and responsibility.

 

“Also in the package was a letter from the grandmother of Anu, including her phone number. She wrote that she was a widow with two daughters, that she lost her husband years ago and raised them alone. She said her eldest daughter informed her that David Adeleke was responsible for her pregnancy after meeting him when he came to Ibadan for a show. She said her daughter gave birth to a baby girl and asked that David step up for a paternity test. She stated clearly that she was not asking David to marry her daughter, only to confirm paternity and take responsibility if confirmed.''

 

Adeleke said he immediately contacted the family, assuring them of his willingness to accept the child if proven to be his granddaughter, and personally arranged a DNA test at Vedic Lifecare Hospital in Lagos, with samples analysed in South Africa.

 

“Immediately I read the letter, even before speaking to David, I called the woman. I told her I hadn’t spoken to my son yet, but if the child was truly my granddaughter, she had no problem with me. I would welcome her into my family happily.

I sent my driver to Ibadan to confirm where they lived. I told her about the hospital I use in Lekki, an Indian hospital, where DNA tests could be arranged. The hospital explained that samples would be taken in Nigeria but sent to South Africa for analysis.''he said

 

He explained that saliva samples were taken from Davido and the child in the presence of all parties and that both he and the child’s grandmother were designated to receive the results.

 

 

“On the appointed day, my driver brought the mother, the grandmother, and the child to Lagos. David, myself, and his aide met them at the hospital. Only David, myself, the grandmother, the mother, and the child were allowed into the room. Samples were taken using saliva, not blood, and sealed for analysis.''he said

 

According to Adeleke, the outcome showed a 0.00 per cent probability of paternity, confirming that Davido was not the child’s father.

 

“When the results were ready, both the grandmother and I went to collect them together, as agreed. The result stated that the probability of paternity was zero percent. The lab explained clearly that David was not the father of the child.''he said

 

He added that despite the negative result, he personally suggested conducting two additional DNA tests to eliminate any doubt, offering to pay for accommodation and logistics while the family remained in Lagos.

 

Adeleke said multiple tests were eventually conducted, all yielding the same conclusion.

 

 

“The grandmother broke down and cried. I told her mistakes could happen and suggested we do two more DNA tests at other reputable centers. I offered to keep them in Lagos for a week at my expense so additional tests could be carried out.

 

Addressing calls for the DNA reports to be made public, Adeleke refused, citing security and legal concerns.

 

“It is dangerous for anyone’s DNA profile to be in the public domain,” he said, adding that releasing such data could expose Davido and the minor to serious risks.''he said

 

He stressed that the Adeleke family had nothing to gain from denying a child, noting that he already has 14 grandchildren.

 

“What is one more? Is it that I cannot afford to take care of her? But there is science. And science is clear.”he said

 

The businessman concluded by urging the public to disregard online narratives surrounding the case, describing them as misleading and driven by impersonation and misinformation.

 

watch a video of him speaking below